Changes in the new definition
- Artificial separation between manufacturing and service MSMEs has been removed.
- Investment criteria for such enterprises have been revised upwards, while an additional criterion of turnover has been introduced.
- The definition being changed is done in the favour of MSMEs. It is expected to give them the confidence to grow.
- There has always been this fear, among successful MSMEs also, that if they outgrow the size of what has been defined as an MSME, they will lose their entitled benefits. This is why MSMEs like to remain within the definition rather than grow. With the revised definitions of MSMEs, they will not have to worry about growing their size and can still avail benefits.
Example: A garment unit with Rs 4 crore of machines was 'small' under the old rule and would lose its MSME benefits by buying one more machine; under the new rule it can grow to Rs 10 crore of investment and still be 'small'.
- This new definition covers almost 99 per cent of all firms enabling MSMEs to grow in size and create jobs.
- No incremental tax obligation ⇒ No fear of losing MSME benefits ⇒ Economies of scale ⇒ Job creation ⇒ productivity gain.



